1216 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  26 - March - 2021

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

 
2021 Fall Date Project

The MPOD Caretakers want to present meteorite falls on their fall dates. For example, Sikhote Aline on 12 February.

This Project will not dip into the MPOD archives so the Caretakers will appreciate anything you can contribute.

To reserve a date just let us know. Thank you in advance :)

Fall Calendar           Dates reserved so far

 

 
Park Forest   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:       1   2   3   4   5   6   7    


View Larger Photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (6)   Steve Brittenham (111)


Photos and write-up by Steve Brittenham.   Copyright (c) Steve Brittenham.

Find/Fall Anniversary
16.2 grams.   L5

TKW 18 kg. Observed fall 26 March 2003, Cook County, Il, USA.

 


Steve writes:
Just before midnight on March 26, 2003, a bright orange fireball was spotted approaching from the southwest in the sky across Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and Ohio; then at approximately 11:50 p.m., hundreds of meteorite fragments showered the village of Park Forest, Illinois (Park Forest is located about 35 miles south of Chicago and was originally designed as a planned community for veterans returning from WWII – although lower now, at the time of the fall, its population was approximately 23,000 people). The event was described as the most densely populated region to be hit by a meteorite shower in modern times. Houses, cars, and a Park Forest fire station were struck, and two streets experienced damage to their asphalt (one meteorite even created a softball-sized hole in one home’s ceiling).

Numerous stones were collected across a 5- by 2-mile strewn field, which had been spread by strong westerly winds over residential neighborhoods and a forest preserve (the smallest pieces were deflected the farthest eastward, while the largest ones – having more momentum – were deflected the least). Collected fragments ranged in size from a few grams to 6.6 pounds. In all, more than 40 pounds of the stone meteorites were recovered.

Park Forest is an L5 ordinary chondrite. Steven Simon (University of Chicago) with seven colleagues from the University of Chicago, the Planetary Studies Foundation, Harper College, Pacific Northwest National Lab, and the Field Museum in Chicago, classified the meteorite and described it as follows:

Most stones are partly to fully fusion-crusted. Some broken faces showed brecciated textures and angular clasts, with cross-cutting dark veins and dark pockets that may be of impact melt origin. Abundant troilite and metal was visible in some broken faces, and while no visible chondrules were seen in the hand sample, chondrules and maskelynite were visible in thin section.


Based on the magnitude of the energy that was released, scientists estimate the size of the Park Forest meteor to have been between 8 and 11 metric tonnes.

The 16.2 gram, partially fusion-crusted piece featured in this post was personally collected by Edwin Thompson of E.T. Meteorites and is one that struck a house on Winslow Street, making it a true “hammer stone” (it shattered when first hitting the street, with pieces ricocheting onto the house, its roof, and a parked car). Photo 1 shows our fragment in a 6 x 5 inch Riker mount display I created many years ago when exhibiting several meteorites at a local rock show (sorry for the poor picture, but with the reflective glass, the photo had to be taken at an angle and then perspective-corrected in software); Photos 2 through 5 offer various views of the fusion-crusted and broken sides.

The 1.5 gram impact melt fragment shown in Photo 6 was also collected on Winslow Street and is somewhat unique in that most Park Forest impact melt lacked any fusion crust. While this particular piece is small (though typical in size compared to some of the smaller pieces of Park Forest collected after the fall), it is distinguishable in that it does contain a small amount of fusion crust on one of its longer surfaces.

Finally, the small vial in Photo 7 contains broken glass collected from the rear window of a car that was impacted by one of the stone fragments (this image offers two perspectives – the front side of the whole bottle next to a 1 cm reference cube, and a magnified view of the back side that better shows the broken glass).
Click to view larger photos

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

Found at the arrow (green or red) on the map below

 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

NWA 5582
Michael Hofmann

This Month

1 picture in the Queue
John Divelbiss
 3/26/2021 5:37:20 PM
crusted impact melt individuals from Chelyabinsk are common...though the crust does not seem to adhere to the melt as easily as it does with normal matrix.
Anne Black
 3/26/2021 3:05:04 PM
Steve, did you ever have the occasion to compare an impact melt pocket from Park Forest to one from Chelyabinsk? They do look alike, I have a bigger one from Chelyabinsk and just like most from Park Forest, there is no crust on it. I would guess that they came from deep inside the meteorite.
Twink Monrad
 3/26/2021 1:03:58 PM
Must be showing my age, it seems like it was yesterday!!
Mike Murray
 3/26/2021 9:00:46 AM
Fantastic to have some of that fall. Lots of dark veins. Not hard to imagine why the main mass broke up so much. I agree, nice presentation as well.
Alexander Natale
 3/26/2021 6:29:17 AM
Really nice presentation.
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
5/11/2024 8:21:04 AM
Last revised
05/05/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe