402 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  18 - June - 2017

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

Dhofar 019   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:     #1   #2    


Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (2)   Steve Brittenham (109)


Copyright (c) Steve Brittenham.
3.67 grams.   Martian (shergottite)

TKW 1056 grams. Fall not observed. Found 24 January 2000 in Oman.

 


Steve writes:
The 1056 gram Dhofar 019 meteorite was found in the desert of Oman on January 24, 2000. Highly weathered and lacking any fusion crust, its texture, mineralogy, major element chemistry, and trace elements resulted in its classification as the 17th Martian meteorite. Dhofar 019 is a shergottite (an igneous rock of plutonic or volcanic origin that resembles its terrestrial cousins more than they do other achondrite meteorites). Less than half a percent of known meteorites come from Mars, but of those, the shergottites are the most common of the SNCs and are further subdivided into three distinct subgroups - basaltic, lherzolitic, and olivine-phyric (Dhofar 109 is an olivine bearing doleritic basalt). Alternatively, shergottites can be categorized into as many as four unique groups based on their rare-earth element content, but these two classification systems do not align with each other, suggesting complex relationships between the various source rocks and magmas that the shergottites formed from.

When I first acquired Dhofar 019 several years ago, it was rather unique: not only was its bulk chemistry similar to India's 1865 Shergotty meteorite - the type specimen for shergotittes - but it's crystallization age of more than 550 million years was, like its famous cousin ALH84001, quite different than the 150 to 250 million year ages of the majority of Martian meteorites known at that time1. Like EETA79001A and DaG 476/489, Dhofar 019 was unusual in its lack of orthopyroxenes. And while alteration from terrestrial weathering was assumed to explain the older carbonate radiogenic dating results in the younger shergottites, Raman spectroscopic analysis suggested Martian alteration in Dhofar 019's (as did testing of ALH84001 - whose unusual carbonate globules are similar to Dhofar 019's smectite-calcium-gypsum "orangettes").

However, more recent analyses of subsequent Martian meteorites suggest two Martian reservoirs - one far less radiogenic than the other - mixed, causing ambiguous trends in Pb isotope variation that result in inaccurate estimates of Martian meteorites' ages. In addition, distinctly different oxygen reservoirs, because of the lack of plate tectonics, continue to exist, thus providing a highly bimodal pattern of surface ages on Mars and allowing for a broader range of origins in the plains of the northern hemisphere (though such exceptions as the 4.4 billion year "Black Beauty" and ALH84001 still likely came from the more ancient southern upland regions). These new findings also allow for a Martian origin for the previously assumed terrestrially weathered carbonates found in a large number of Martian meteorites.

While Dhofar 019 was no longer necessarily unique in its indications of Martian weathering or having one of the oldest crystallization ages of any Martian meteorite, it was still unusual in exhibiting excessive cosmic ray exposure and having a heterogeneous interior with apparent layering that gives it a texture visually quite different from coarse-grained shergottites like Zagami. This 3.67 gram slice of Dhofar 019 also exhibits a distinctive red/green bicolor appearance that makes it one of the favorite Martian meteorites in my collection.

Footnote
1 With the notable exception of a very few unique examples like Dhofar 019 and ALH 84001, the majority of the first twenty or so Martian meteorites shared similar bulk chemistries and extremely young crystallization ages - ages younger than most of the Martian surface. At the time, these observations suggested a most unlikely explanation: most Martian meteorites came from an area that covered only a few percent of the total surface on Mars. The prevailing explanation for this 1990's "Martian age paradox" suggested the bulk of the shergottites were ejected in a single event from the northern plains of Mars rather than in multiple events, with the few more ancient exceptions coming from separate events in the much older southern uplands. Even as late as the mid 2000's, scientists were suggesting new reasons to support a limited source area for most Martian meteorites.
Click to view larger photos

#1

#2

Found at the arrow (green or red) on the map below

 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

Esquel
Paul Swartz

This Month

1 picture in the Queue
Steve Brittenham
 6/18/2017 2:52:29 PM
You know, John, that's a very good question. I never thought about it, nor have I looked that closely at it under a zoom microscope. It's packed deep down inside a box locked in my the safe right now - otherwise I'd pull it out and look at it. Definitely has me curious . . .
John Divelbiss
 6/18/2017 12:09:33 PM
Is that the outline of a vesicle/vug on the left side of Pic 1 ? Nice writeup on the martian rocks, and I agree that Dhofar 019 is a unique looking achondrite. my *1 gram slice also has a reddish hue to it.
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
4/24/2024 7:55:46 PM
Last revised
03/29/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe