305 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  5 - December - 2015

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

Unclassified NWA   contributed by Andreas Koppelt, IMCA 6161   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:     #1   #2   #3   #4    


Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (67)   Andreas Koppelt (22)


Copyright (c) Andreas Koppelt.
294.2 grams.   unclassified

Andreas writes:
This little iron is possibly a single desert iron, purchased 2011 from a Moroccan dealer. It shows minimal to moderate weathering and a big open inclusion. I am undecided if I should cut it for a classification. I wouldn't like to destroy this little beauty.


  Click to view larger photos     #1     #2     #3     #4
 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

Molong
Graham Macleod

This Month

1 picture in the Queue
Andreas Koppelt
 12/6/2015 4:43:19 AM
Hello Anne, Bob, thank you for the hint. Yes, the flat corner would be the right place to make a window. I considered the window-solution, too, but a single window won*t reveal too much information and is no official classification ether. Decision is made. I*ll keep it, as it is: A rare untouched desert iron ;-)
Bob Verish
 12/6/2015 2:32:32 AM
I cast my vote with Anne. Look at Photo 4. Certainly that flat side is not all that worthy, and clearly would be an improvement if it were discretely polished. It's not like we're compromising pristine fusion-crust. We're talking here about iron oxide, after all.
Mark Bittmann
 12/5/2015 11:31:32 PM
Far too beautiful to cut.
Anne Black
 12/5/2015 12:11:46 PM
Hello Andi, did you consider polishing a "window"? Look on Photo4, there is a relatively flat corner, bottom left, and that window would be big enough to give a good idea as of the type.
Andreas Koppelt
 12/5/2015 8:02:58 AM
@ Bernd: Difficult to judge by eye. The inclusion is not attracted by a magnet, but troilite is non-magnetic, too. It*s strange granular weathering structure indicates rather a Silicate than a Troilite inclusion in my opinion.
Bernd Pauli
 12/5/2015 6:31:42 AM
"I wouldn't like to destroy this little beauty." Nor would I ! Is it a silicate-containing inclusion?
Ray Watts
 12/5/2015 5:50:52 AM
Spectacular piece !
Gourgues denis
 12/5/2015 4:32:04 AM
Maybe H.... Dont't cut !!!...certainly a classic C. Ordinary... She is magnificent so.
John Hope
 12/5/2015 2:09:05 AM
I would hate to have to make that decision Andreas. It is a spectacular individual.
Ben Fisler
 12/5/2015 1:50:36 AM
It IS too pretty to cut.
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
4/26/2024 11:59:07 PM
Last revised
03/29/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe