1126 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  1 - October - 2020

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

Prambanan   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:     #1   #2   #3   #4   #5    


Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (2)   Steve Brittenham (109)


Copyright (c) Steve Brittenham.
A keris or kris made from this meteorite.   Iron, ungrouped

TKW 500 kg. Fall not observed. Found 1797, Indonesia.



   


Steve writes:
The Prambanan meteorite fell sometime around 1749, breaking into two pieces (the largest more than one cubic meter in size). Considered a gift from the gods, Sri Paku Buwono III had the smaller piece transported to Surakarta’s Sunanate Palace on February 13, 1784. Almost exactly thirteen years to the day later – on February 12, 1797 – Paku Buwono IV had the larger piece moved to Surakarta’s Kasunanan Palace (near the Hindi Prambanan temple). There it was given the name Kanjeng Kyai Pamor and subsequently used to make keris swords and other aji tosan (historic Javanese weaponry).

The smaller meteorite is thought to have been totally consumed for artifacts; but for the better part of the next century, the larger meteorite continued to serve as a source of metal for special weapons and other significant pieces. Craftsmen would heat the main mass until it was red hot – approximately 900º C – then chisel off pieces to forge into bars. Later, smaller pieces were hot-chiseled off from those larger bars and worked flat to be combined with flat strips of other metals – usually iron or steel – in a Damascus-like process (several of these hot-chiseled fragments appear in collections at Berlin, Bonn, Budapest, Chicago, Greifswald, Hamburg, London, Paris, Stockholm, Strasbourg, Vienna, and Washington).

The keris swords created from the resulting alloy were regarded as sacred personal weapons of great spiritual attachment, and as such they were one of the most valued, revered, and treasured heirlooms to be passed down to Javanese males from generation to generation. The complete keris consisted of an asymmetrical blade, a curved hilt (which was often fashioned in Bali), and a corresponding sheath (sometimes from Madura). Each typically measured 12 to 15 inches in length.

Ceremonial pieces and gifts to dignitaries were also fashioned from the meteorite. These keris swords were typically much more ornate, as they were not designed for use as actual weapons. (As an example, four of the five beautifully finished curved daggers given to the Emperor of Austria in 1907 can still be found in Vienna’s Ethnographical Collection.)

But in the late 1800s, Paku Buwono IX decided to preserve what still remained of the larger meteorite and had a special edifice built for it that was surrounded by a 3 foot high iron fence to protect the meteorite while still allowing for its display. Unfortunately, exposed to the elements for decades, both it and the fence had become severely weathered by the mid-20th century.

I’ve always been drawn to meteorite and tektite artifacts, like my smaller Prambanan spear points featured on 8/17/2017. While I had known of the keris in Photos 1 through 3 for several years, only last month was I finally able to acquire it. This particular one is likely an early ceremonial piece: compared to the rear of the hilt seen in Photo 4, its more ornate front in Photo 5 also has holes that in other similar examples were filled with jewels (possibly robbed from this piece sometime in the past); further, the handles of those intended to be used as weapons were curved downwards toward the edge of the blade to allow holding it much like a pistol, unlike the only lightly curved hilt of this keris that points up and away from the face of the blade, making for a better face-on presentation (and explaining its much simpler back side).
Click to view larger photos

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

Found at the arrow (green or red) on the map below

 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

Kolang
Raymond Borges

This Month

Uwe
 10/2/2020 12:25:55 PM
Hello Steve, thanks for the hints. let's see if I can find someone who has such an xrf device standing around here. I'll ask in our German community. otherwise I'll send the pictures up in the link. I think it looks a lot like your keris. however, my blade is not quite as wide anymore. It looks very frayed on the cutting edges. cu Uwe
Steve Brittenham
 10/1/2020 2:24:21 PM
Anne, if you go into the MetBul listing for Prambanan and click on the Buchwald link there, it will take you to a writeup that shows one of the chiseled pieces in Vienna (unfortunately, the picture isn't great, but if you have his books, I'm sure you'll get a better view). That said, there are no known pieces that haven't already been significantly heated or layered with other metal, but the Buchwald entry does talk about some analysis on this altered material that described some characteristics of the meteorite (they concluded it was likely an ungrouped fine octahedrite). Sorry I don't have a better answer for you (I too would like to see an unaltered piece).
Steve Brittenham
 10/1/2020 2:17:27 PM
Hi Uwe. Probably the simplest way to get an idea if the metal might be from a meteorite is to look at its nickel content (not a perfect indicator, but certainly a necessity). Terrestrial iron doesn't have much nickel (2% is considered high grade ore), whereas meteorites typically range from 4% to 30%. XRF's can do this non-destructively. But when folded with other metal, you have to find a layer of the meteorite material to look at. And I don't think one can add pictures to the discussion, but you can submit things of your own using the upper rightmost link -- Paul is always looking for fun things to publish!
Anne Black
 10/1/2020 1:19:03 PM
Steve, is there any piece of the meteorite left anywhere so we can at least get an idea of what it looked like before it was chopped up?
Uwe
 10/1/2020 12:55:18 PM
Help, how can I add pictures here?
Uwe
 10/1/2020 12:26:26 PM
Hi Steve, congratulations on this wonderful keris. I came to collect keris myself because I also bought a keris with a meteor blade. otherwise I especially collect meteorites. the blade should also be prambanam. The only problem is, how can you find out that this is actually a blade made of meteor iron. this question has haunted me ever since. I am grateful for every tip. Best regards, Uwe
Steve Brittenham
 10/1/2020 11:05:40 AM
Alfredo, the MetBul is full of inconsistencies, especially with early meteorites. As an example, Buchwald reported both an earlier finding for this meteorite and a known second piece; yet the reported year found was 1797 * the year the second piece was moved to the palace. The 1 meter dimension was an alleged measurement that was never officially verified (and in fact was after other material had already been previously removed); and the weight would have similarly been estimated, as the original mass was never actually weighed. Further, the weight and size of the smaller mass are completely undescribed. So I wouldn*t put too much significance in the 500 kg (I*m not even sure where it came from!).
Steve Brittenham
 10/1/2020 10:45:21 AM
Hi Andi. As Paul noted, the Prambanan meteorite is only incompletely known from a 250 gram sample sent to the Netherlands in 1865. And like all other known pieces, it had already undergone repetitive heating when small portions were previously cold-chiseled off of the meteorite. So it can*t be said with 100% certainty that this keris is Prambanan. But the previous owner was an affluent collector that was very thorough and diligent in his acquisitions, and the shape and other characteristics of this piece is quite consistent with other known examples in museums. And XRF measurements that show nickel are highly indicative of meteorite metal (though analysis of an oxidized and worked piece like this is tricky to get representative readings).
Paul Swartz
 10/1/2020 10:14:03 AM
Buchwald tells us "This meteorite is only insufficiently known through a small fragment of 1/4 kg which was sent to the Netherlands from Soerakarta in 1865. ... It appears that all specimens presently in collections are cuttings from [this] specimen".
Alfredo Petrov
 10/1/2020 7:17:15 AM
Why is the TKW reported as only 500 Kg if one piece of the fall was over 1 cubic meter in size?
Graham Ensor
 10/1/2020 6:37:36 AM
wonderful peice and story.
Andi Koppelt
 10/1/2020 5:07:41 AM
Whow! Interesting history and artefact. Is the meteoritic origin of the blade proved in some way?
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
4/20/2024 1:41:05 AM
Last revised
03/29/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe