320 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  20 - December - 2016

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

Murchison   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:     #1   #2   #3   #4   #5   #6   #7   #8    


Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (30)   Steve Brittenham (110)


Copyright (c) Steve Brittenham.
127.2 grams.   CM2

TKW 100 kg. Observed fall 28 September 1969, near Near Murchison, Victoria, Australia.



Steve writes:
Photos:
1: Murchison Individual (top)
2: Murchison Individual (reverse)
3: Murchison Individual (side)
4: Murchison Individual (back)
5: Murchison Individual (in display case)
6: Murchison Rollover Lip
7: Murchison Empty Chondrule
8: Murchison Incluson X-Ray (animated GIF)

Past MPOD submissions have already presented some outstanding examples of Murchison, including the recent one by Pierre-Marie that posted just as I was finishing this write-up. But I thought I’d go ahead and still offer mine, partly because I’d already put the work in, but mostly in hopes of benefitting from the knowledge of MPOD’s viewers regarding a couple of characteristics I know very little about.

Murchison is arguably the best-studied meteorite of all time and, because of its contributions to our understanding of the universe around us, it’s one of my personal favorites. Most readers already know of its organic compounds, extraterrestrial amino acids with biased handedness similar to that caused by biological processes on Earth1, and even nucleobases2. Its pre-solar grains predate our solar system by as much as a billion years3, and isotopic signatures of some of its organics point to a possible extra-solar origin that if true suggests the presence of life’s building blocks outside of our own solar system4.

This 127.2 gram oriented individual was acquired many years ago through a Smithsonian trade for some d’Orbigny (hence the USNM/NMNH catalog number seen in some of the photos). Photos 1 through 4 were taken under very strong lighting and the contrast and color balance were adjusted to better show its features; alternately Photo 5 was not manipulated and shows a truer representation of its actual color (for reference, the round case displaying a separate Murchison fragment has a diameter of 1”). Photo 6 presents a collage of different areas of the rollover lip that displays its frothy fusion crust, molten splatters, and an unaltered portion of the trailing side that offers a window into the meteorite’s interior. And the enlarged view in Photo 7 shows a spherical depression that apparently once held an approximately 1 mm diameter chondrule.

My first question has to do with the tan-colored streaking most evident in Photos 1 and 2. Only some of the pieces of Murchison I’ve seen exhibit this coloration, and I’ve been told it’s either from ablated minerals in parts of the original meteoroid or from interactions with something encountered in Earth’s atmosphere as pieces of the meteor fell. I’m not sure which (if either) explanation is correct and would value feedback from those with knowledge about what it actually is.

My second question is in regards to some x-ray scans I took of the meteorite. Photo 8 is an animated gif overlaying pictures at two different x-ray intensities to show some extremely dense inclusions that were effectively opaque to all energy levels I tried. Though I was (probably naively) unaware that metal in CM meteorites could appear as blebs, I’m guessing from their opacity to x-rays that those in the photo are indeed that. Some of the orange-colored areas on the back side of the meteorite (Photo 4) do appear that they might be from metal oxidation, though I understand staining from Fe-rich silicates and other mineral inclusions is a more likely explanation for many – if not all – of them. But I’m a real amateur when it comes to the science of meteorites, so I would greatly appreciate others’ thoughts regarding what these opaque blebs might be.

Thanks for reading, and Happy Holidays!


1 There is some work suggesting that aqueous alteration could explain Murchison’s abundance of L- compared to D-enantiomers (refer to www.psrd.hawaii.edu/April11/amino_acids.html).

2 arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0806/0806.2286.pdf

3 iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/359http

4 www.britannica.com/topic/Murchison-meteorite
Click to view larger photos

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

Found at the arrow (green or red) on the map below

 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

Paloduro
Anne Black

This Month

2 pictures in the Queue
Jason
 12/22/2016 3:31:36 AM
It's dirt. See: meteor-center.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/murchison-42.6g [dot] jpg
Jim Strope
 12/21/2016 7:17:17 PM
Great specimen and write-up. Thanks for posting.
Jon Taylor
 12/21/2016 3:22:29 PM
What a spectacular piece!
Steve Brittenham
 12/20/2016 12:55:25 PM
part 2: So maybe the answer to this question has multiple components as well. Anyway, thanks again everyone!
Steve Brittenham
 12/20/2016 12:54:41 PM
First, thanks everyone for the kind comments. It*s always fun putting things together and then sharing with such a great audience! MexicoDoug, your explanation for the brown streaking is certainly interesting. After reading the reply from *questions*, I pulled it out of the safe and looked at it again, then I also looked at the brown portions on Pierre-Marie*s great specimen from a few days ago. I*m not sure the impact contamination explanation fully accounts for all of the characteristics of this coloration; in particular, your explanation does seem to be more consistent with the streaking pattern on mine. But I certainly don*t want to dismiss the possibility of terrestrial contamination out of hand either (maybe it*s a combination of both?). And I think I can imagine how metal might accumulate on the back of an oriented meteorite during its fall, though while it*s hard to tell from the animated gif, the blebs do appear within the meteorite at various depths. So maybe the answ
MexicoDoug
 12/20/2016 12:20:42 PM
part 2. I think there is enough present that the crust could easily be "seasoned" with the degradation breakdown products of these aromatic hydrocarbons. Or maybe just from the ground :-) (corrections backed on => baked on; 0.4$ =>0.4%)
MexicoDoug
 12/20/2016 12:18:00 PM
Steve, what can I say! You come up with the greatest write-up and the meteorite is superb! Thank you for spending the time to share your knowledge and fun research! As for the questions, my impulse was the same as the comment by poster named 'questions' .. probably stains from the desert with perhaps some rust toning of the oxidized metals. But maybe I'm overthinking this after you prompted it ... going to throw out there that it is certainly possible that the streaks are actually backed on "extraterrestrial oil" residue, not to different from a cast iron skillet that could gets that colors from seasoning ... the repeated heat decomposition of organic oils like olive, canola etc, But in this case Murchison is reported to be 0.4$ complex organic molecules, and 90% of that is "aromatic oils" = benzene and more interestingly, polycyclic aromatics. I think there is enough present that the crust could easily be "seasoned" with the degradation breakdown products of these aromatic hy
Herbert
 12/20/2016 8:49:40 AM
Unbelievable specimen. Thanks for sharing the images!
Mark Bowling
 12/20/2016 7:23:46 AM
Very nice, thanks for sharing!
Graham
 12/20/2016 5:24:26 AM
Excellent individual.
Mike Tettenborn
 12/20/2016 4:15:09 AM
Wow! A woderful specimen. May thanks for the picture af write up.
Kally Wombacher
 12/20/2016 3:22:16 AM
A masterpiece. Thanks for posting!
questions
 12/20/2016 2:30:46 AM
1) Brown streaks are soil scuffs from impact with the ground. 2) Metal 'blebs' often form on the rear of oriented meteorites if there is a sufficient amount of melt.
Pierre-Marie Pel*
 12/20/2016 1:17:05 AM
Amazing specimen !!!
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
5/1/2024 5:02:26 PM
Last revised
03/29/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe