315 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  12 - November - 2016

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

Salem   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:     #1   #2   #3   #4   #5    


Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (1)   Steve Brittenham (109)


3.72 grams. 20 x 17 x 12 mm.   L6

TKW 61.4 grams. Observed fall 13 May 1981, Salem, Marion County, Oregon, USA.


Steve writes:
This particular piece is small – at only 20 x 17 x 12 mm, it’s a mere 3.72 grams – and as an L6 breccia, Salem is far from a rare classification. It is somewhat distinguished by being the fifth of only six classified meteorites from Oregon, the first of only two Oregon chondrites, and Oregon’s only observed fall. It’s also a hammer stone. But what makes this little gem unique is the fact that out of the more than 60,000 meteorites found to date, Salem is the only one shown to have encountered Earth more than once.

On May 13th, 1981, Marion County sheriff Jim Price had just finished his swing shift. At 1:05 a.m. while sitting on the curb in front of his Salem, Oregon house and talking with an on-duty sheriff in his patrol car, he heard a fluttering noise just before something hit and bounced off the roof of his house. Since no light or other related phenomena were observed, he initially assumed it was a rock flung from the mischievous neighbor boy’s homemade slingshot. But minutes later, when Price picked up his first piece from the street in front of his driveway, he found it to be oddly cold.1 Also noticing what appeared to be fusion crust, his college training in physics and geology helped him immediately recognize it as a fragment from an obviously larger meteorite. So the next morning he searched and found four more pieces: one on the driveway leading to his garage; another in the gutter on the front of the garage; a third on the back of the garage roof; and a final piece in the street not far from the earlier morning’s find that, unfortunately, had been run over by a car.

Price brought his finds to work the next day and began piecing the fragments together. Three formed what appeared to be a half stone that in total would have been about the size of a tennis ball. The other two pieces connected to each other, but they did not fit with the prior three. Still, in total the five appeared to comprise about two-thirds of an oriented meteorite with shock veins and fusion crust that was, in parts, as much as an eighth of an inch thick. When Price realized pieces were obviously missing he hurried home in hopes of finding more, but not before seeing a street sweeper just down the street from his house that likely already swept up the remaining bits. Additional searches later that afternoon turned up no new material; however Price did notice a 6 cm irregular chip out of a shingle on his roof apparently made by the intact meteorite’s initial impact.2 This information and the lack of light or sharp claps accompanying its fall suggested Salem was a slow traveling meteorite that came from the southwest with a low angle of trajectory.

Within two months a sample was undergoing testing at the United States Department of Energy’s Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory.3 Initial inspection revealed a relatively thick fusion crust for such a small object, indicative of a primary stone as opposed to part of a shower. SEM and XRF examinations of two small chips suggested Salem was a relatively rare LL5 amphoterite, but later chemical analyses would change that to a more common L6 breccia classification.

Especially intriguing though were multidimensional gamma-ray spectrometry 29Al and 56Co counts that were thirty to fifty times higher than expected for a stone this size – results that indicated a solar cosmic ray exposure not previously seen in a meteorite.4 These and subsequent findings from other researchers’ studies provided evidence that Salem had actually made more than one pass through Earth’s atmosphere, with all but the last creating the lower layers of fusion crust that then experienced cosmic ray exposure after the meteor skipped back into space (Salem has as many as five layers of fusion crust in spots). Studies also suggested only about 1 cm of material ablated during Salem’s final fall to Earth, counter to its shallow trajectory that normally ablates more material in a prolonged fall, but likely instead a consequence of its low velocity as evidenced by no obvious fireball or sonic booms.

As can be seen in the photos, Salem is obviously an oriented meteorite that exhibits a rollover lip and frothy fusion crust on its trailing side. Surprisingly, layered fusion crust does not appear on all sides of the meteorite. Given Salem is believed to be a single stone and not part of a shower, no clear explanation has yet been posed describing its flight dynamics and corresponding fusion crust formation during its multiple passes through Earth’s atmosphere.

The majority of Price’s original 61.4 grams of meteorite fragments have been ground up by research institutes. CML (Cascadia Meteorite Labs) formerly owned most of the original five fragments, but after distributing small samples to several other researchers in various labs, they returned the largest remaining pieces to Price. CML, the Smithsonian, and UCSD all still have very small bits, but this 3.72 gram crusted fragment – originally broken off of one of the bigger ones – is the largest remaining piece of this unique meteorite.


1 An article in Oregon Geology (reference 2) described Price as noting the meteorite was hot upon first picking it up – this is one of several errors in that article that Price pointed out several years ago when selling the piece in these photos to Edwin Thompson (who I later acquired it from). As many know, meteorite temperatures are near absolute zero in space and as soon as they land, their frigid internal temperatures can flash cool the hot fusion crust, often creating contraction cracks and even causing frost to form in some cases.

2 library.state.or.us/repository/2010/201009071430032/1983-06.pdf

3 www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc1987/pdf/1138.pdf

4 articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1990Metic..25R.392N&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf

Click to view larger photos

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

Found at the arrow (green or red) on the map below

 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

Jilin
Herbert Raab

This Month

1 picture in the Queue
Gregor Hoeher
 11/14/2016 2:23:19 AM
Nice meteorite and interesting story. Thanks for sharing. I personally do not think that there was more than one flight through the atmosphere. Instead the fusion crust was formed by a normal process (thick bubbling crust on the trailing edge was formed through low pressure and flow during the oriented fall).
Graham
 11/13/2016 5:31:03 AM
Interesting discussion....I would say that the only way to get multiple layers would indeed for the meteorite to stay oriented so that one side was protected from ablation and therefore only "accumulated fusion crust spraying or flowing backwards around and over the protected side on the subsequent encounters with hot flight....thus the leading faces each time would get ablated to one layer...hence the one small part showing with layers.
John Divelbiss
 11/12/2016 1:19:43 PM
Beautiful piece with nice history. My opinion: Layered crusts are likely a function of the overall dynamics of the fall including the material makeup, angle of flight to atmosphere and it's makeup, actual crusting elevation, etc. Chelyabinsk has a couple notable layers where there seem to have been an initial reddish brown "flash" crust, followed by a slower velocity buildup of a darker crust that in some cases is frothy under the right conditions. I would think this last phase that makes bubble crust has to have the right "mix" of properties and speed. The time to make these crusts including the layers of crust is likely in the multiple seconds range. (my ideas guys)
Steve Brittenham
 11/12/2016 11:41:52 AM
I don't know how I ended up with two replies (sorry!), and I see there is a limit to how long one can be. The rest of mine noted that Salem's layers seem to get progressively thinner with depth (photo 4), which may offer yet another hint about its flight dynamics and crust formation. And I would have thought any lower CRE-affected layers would have left evidence of CRE in the uppermost layer (unless heating changes that somehow). Again, this goes to my naivety in all of this! Given how many research institutions purportedly worked on Salem, I was surprised how little information I could find about that research. So it would be great to hear from the more learned folks in the MPOD audience on all of this! Sorry I couldn't answer your question Herbert.
Steve Brittenham
 11/12/2016 11:31:54 AM
Hi Herbert. First let me acknowledge to everyone that I have no formal training in meteorites or geology, so most of what I learn (and assembled into this write up for Salem) is what I glean from the web or other sources. Your question is indeed intriguing, and hopefully it's not a consequence of some misinterpretation on my part of what I summarized in the above text. It does kind of go with another question of mine regarding why one edge has multiple layers of fusion crust, while the other has but one thin one? I wonder if the answer to these questions has something to do with Salem's orientation during its fall(s) or how it skipped through our atmosphere before its last encounter? Maybe there's a hint in the observation that the outermost layer on the layered edge is really thick, while the lower layers are less so (as you can see in the fourth photo, they seem to get almost progressively thinner). I wonder if the lower layer(s) started out thicker before being exposed to h
Herbert
 11/12/2016 10:53:18 AM
Interesting meteorite with an interesting story. What I don*t understand, though, is this: How is it possible that "lower layers of fusion crust" from previouse passes trough the Earth*s atmosphere can be found, when "1 cm of material ablated during Salem*s final fall to Earth"? Ablation during the (last) fall should have removed any fusion crust from possible previouse encounters...?
Bob Falls
 11/12/2016 6:23:08 AM
Steve, Excellent photos and information! Thanks for putting all this together and sharing on MPOD.
Rob Wesel
 11/12/2016 1:45:45 AM
Still needed in my collection Steve, if this or any others ever come available please keep me in mind.
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
4/25/2024 7:25:42 PM
Last revised
03/29/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe