Anne Black 7/28/2016 8:10:04 PM |
I would like to see pictures of the thin-section (if one was made!!) |
Wilford Krantz 7/28/2016 12:24:27 PM |
Good question 'Z'. Do we not trust the MetBul? |
z 7/28/2016 10:25:57 AM |
I am curious about the comments here which state surprise that this is a CR2 rather than CV3. Why? Is it the lack of metal? Perhaps that is just the angle of the photo... are there other reasons? Also... is the met bull list not conclusive? In other words, if it's classified as a CR2, then it's a CR2 pretty much without question... right? |
anon 7/28/2016 3:58:50 AM |
That's a nice CV3. |
Graham 7/28/2016 3:55:24 AM |
Although in the first image it does have more chondrules similar to CR and CAIs are more unusual.
|
Graham 7/28/2016 3:53:18 AM |
Me too Aziz...I would have been sure it was a CV3.
|
Aziz 7/28/2016 3:07:58 AM |
Im amazed that this beauty is a cr2 |
|