412 views

Over 15,000 photos and growing!


  4 - July - 2017

This Month       Today's Picture       Select a Month

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Queue


Select by   Contributor

Met Name

Met Type

Thin Sections


Recent Comments

Norton County   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link


Roll Overs:     #1   #2    


Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (11)   Steve Brittenham (109)


Copyright (c) Steve Brittenham.
1.3 gram fragment.   Aubrite

TKW 1.1 tons (1000 kg). Observed fall February 18, 1948, near Norton, Kansas, USA.

 


Steve writes:
In honor of America's birthday, I told Paul I could do a 4th of July submission that showed red fluorescence of a white U.S. meteorite with blue UV reflections (alright, more like magenta, white, and purplish-blue, but hopefully close enough!). So with that introduction, I humbly offer this example of the Norton County meteorite. (And my apologies to Paul's audience from other countries that might not get the red, white, and blue reference.)

Norton County is a well-known aubrite that has already appeared on a half dozen wonderful MPODs. The piece in this submission doesn't add anything by way of size or obviously unique features, but since not a lot of people I've talked to are aware of it, I thought it would be fun to share some examples of Norton County's fluorescence.

Aubrites are principally composed of enstatite, but that mineral in Norton County contains much less iron, making it white as compared to the green to brown or even almost dark gray colors of some of the other aubrites. The even lower iron content crystals fluoresce under shortwave UV but under normal light are hard to differentiate from the adjacent non-fluorescing enstatite.

To illustrate this phenomenon, the animated gif in Photo 1 shows a 1.3 gram Norton County fragment under both normal white and shortwave UV lights (for reference, the diameter of the pedestal is one inch). The photo setup was a bit difficult to implement with the equipment I have and as a consequence the angles of these lights were necessarily different, but the effect is nonetheless still evident. The purplish-blue illumination was not visible to the naked eye, but to the camera's 15 second exposures the effect is likely similar to the non-fluorescent reflections often seen when using long wave UV light. Over the small fluorescent areas of this piece, this pervasive purplish-blue glow tended to make the naturally yellowish-orange fluorescence appear magenta in the long exposures.

As an aside, Norton County is my only aubrite, and none of my other 300 or so meteorites fluoresce. In fact only five of my eighteen pieces of that meteorite do, possibly suggesting that even in Norton County, the fluorescing minerals are somewhat rare. Similarly, a couple of years ago I was at Bob Falls' house and out of curiosity tested a large slice of his Pena Blanca Springs aubrite. A handful of very small areas did fluoresce, possibly indicating that this phenomenon - though sparse when present - is a common attribute of aubrites that exhibit white enstatite. I also have a Cumberland Falls thin section that I wanted to check, but like my Norton County thin section, it's glass also has hazing problems.
Click to view larger photos

#1

#2

Found at the arrow (green or red) on the map below


View Larger Map
 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

Lorenzo
Anne Black

This Month

1 picture in the Queue
Steve Brittenham
 7/4/2017 5:16:29 PM
Hi Bill. I think you're suggesting I'll see how brightly the adhesive fluoresces, right? I understand that aubrites like Pena Blanca Springs are stabilized with Opticon before cutting, and I don't know if that fluoresces, so that might be "coloring" my Pena Blanca Springs observations. But there shouldn't be any in my Norton County pieces. And I sent you an email with some pictures that didn't make it into the post that I think will more clearly show the actual fluorescence. Again, thanks!
Bill Mikuska
 7/4/2017 4:52:14 PM
Hello Steve, Try your UV light on a glass slide with a drop of the dried adhesive. Bill
Steve Brittenham
 7/4/2017 4:37:48 PM
Hi Bill. I have several Norton County's that don't fluoresce, so not all do. The wax you describe does fluoresce, but there is none in the magenta areas (which is orangish to the naked eye). My pictures that Paul didn't include this time make the fluorescence much more obvious (especially my bigger piece, that has no wax and glows yellow like that in the ASU link in my comments below). And you're right about iron - the lack of iron is what ASU attributes to the fluorescence. Thanks!
Bill Mikuska
 7/4/2017 4:28:58 PM
The adhesive used fluoresces blue (see bottom of image and a bit of glue on left side ~ 1/3 up from bottom). Reflection is most likely the cause of the "red". I checked my 72.3 sample of Norton under LW,, SW, and midrange UV and there is no indication of fluorescence. Iron(III) rarely fluoresces in terrestrial feldspars and Iron is generally known to quench fluorescence. Bill Mikuska microchem@comcast.net
Jansen Lyons
 7/4/2017 1:40:07 PM
That's awesome! I've always wanted a Norton County, but I never knew it did that under UV. That's awesome!! Happy 4th of July to all our American neighbors and colleagues! God bless!
Steve Brittenham
 7/4/2017 1:07:04 PM
Sorry Anne, one last thing. I assume you're using short wave UV light. Long wave or even medium wave doesn't seem to work (at least not with my 9W lights).
Steve Brittenham
 7/4/2017 1:04:48 PM
And I just ran across this ASU link that shows a great example similar to my 9.3 gram in appearance (though ASU's is much nicer!): meteorites.asu.edu/meteorites/norton-county
Steve Brittenham
 7/4/2017 1:02:06 PM
Happy 4th to everyone! Anne, it*s hard to tell from the small fragment shots, but yes, it*s actually fluorescence. My original submission had gifs from two other angles that made it much clearer, as well as a 9.3 gram individual that because of a larger area of fluorescence required less exposure time and was obviously yellow in the spots that glowed (I*m hoping the other part of this will run another day). And Bob Falls an attest to the Pena Blanca Springs, but again, only a very few spots fluoresced.
Anne Black
 7/4/2017 11:15:01 AM
I have a nice slice of Mayo-Belwa, and no it does not fluoresce. (Are you sure it is not simply a reflection of the light? I have many fluorescent minerals in my mineral collection, and ...... Just wondering).
Randy Sinukoff
 7/4/2017 5:47:03 AM
Cool. I will check the piece of Norton County I own and see if or how much it fluoresces.
Denis Gourgues
 7/4/2017 12:58:20 AM
... HAPPY 4TH OF JULY !!!...
Denis Gourgues
 7/4/2017 12:55:41 AM
HAPPY 4TH FOR JULY !!!.
Hothonis Gourgues
 7/4/2017 12:38:15 AM
Very Impressive photo....
 

Hosted by
Tucson Meteorites
Server date and time
4/25/2024 5:16:07 AM
Last revised
03/29/24
Terms of Use Unsubscribe