464 views

Terms of Use           Hosted by Tucson Meteorites


  21 - June - 2017


ctrl-D to Bookmark This Month      

Submit a Picture

Where is My Picture?!

The Q

All Thin Sections

Pictures by Contributor

Pictures by Met Name

Pictures by Type

Today's Picture

Recent Comments

NWA 4734   contributed by Steve Brittenham, IMCA 2184   MetBul Link
 


Roll Overs:     #1   #2   #3   #4    

Click the picture to view larger photos

View all entries for   Meteorite (2)   Contributor (42)


Photo Copyright (c) Steve Brittenham.
See Contributor comments.   Lunar
 


Steve writes:
NWA 4734 is an extensively shocked lunar mare basalt (an extrusive volcanic rock that cooled from magma extruded onto the lunar surface). A very fresh meteorite with a debated monzogabbro sub-classification, it has a mixture of glossy black and duller black/brown fusion crust with an interior texture described as shergottite-like by some and by others as eucritic. One of the few unbrecciated lunar basalts, it is compositionally and texturally identical with the Antarctic LaPaz Icefield meteorite basalts and is likely launch paired from the same source crater. All have crystallization ages around 3.1 billion years ago - younger than those associated with the Apollo and Luna basalt examples - and while they also share very similar bulk compositions, mineral compositions, textures, and age with NWA 032, the latter is not felt to belong to this group.

NWA 4734 consists of several pieces, two totaling 477 grams that were purchased by A. Habibi in October 2006, and several additional ones totaling 895 grams acquired by M. Oumama. Around that same time, an additional piece was sold to E. Thompson and sent for separate classification. Then in February 2016, a 350 gram piece now thought to be one of the original 895 gram group was purchased and given the name NWA 10597.

The piece shown in Photos 1 and 2 is from the first sets of recovered stones. Because it's thin and irregular, it doesn't provide a particularly good idea of the texture of this meteorite. Conversely the larger 35.9 gram, 50 x 44 x 13 mm piece in Photos 3 and 4 was cut from Thompson's stone and gives a better idea of the meteorite's characteristic (in Photo 4, one can also see where the classification piece was cut from the back side). It's fun to pass this one around when my wife and I give meteorite talks at the local schools - that way when the kids leave they can say they actually touched a piece of the moon!


  Click to view larger photos     Photo 1     Photo 2     Photo 3     Photo 4
 


Comment on this MPOD                      
Name
Comment

980 max length

  Please - NO Dealer Ads in the comments
but pictures from dealers are gladly accepted

Tomorrow

EET 92042
AMN

This Month

2 pictures in the Queue
John Divelbiss
 6/21/2017 1:37:47 PM
lunar basalt two days in a row !! nice material too
Steve Brittenham
 6/21/2017 12:46:19 PM
Hi Mike. Thanks for the nice comment. As an amateur in all of this, it's fun to research pieces I acquire and share what I learn. But things can change so fast that some of what I write about is either already wrong or becomes wrong shortly after! So hopefully it doesn*t seem like I*m professing to be an expert or anything * to the contrary, this is just a hobby of mine, and these write-ups are how I learn more about meteorites. But it*s nice to hear from people that are enjoying them. Again, thanks so much * it makes doing this that much more worthwhile!
Mike Fiedler
 6/21/2017 11:34:27 AM
Steve, I really enjoy the background you provide with each MPOD you bring us. Both the provenance and the makeup of the subject stone is helpful in expanding my understanding of these cosmic missels.
Colonel Pulaerko
 6/21/2017 10:40:11 AM
Stupendous!
 

Unsubscribe  



Current server date and time: 9/18/2020 1:23:53 AM
Last revised 8/15/2020